🐦 Archived X post

A tamper-evident, on-chain timestamp of what this post said. Captured 2026-09-22 14:25 UTC.

@doge_rizon X · 2026-09-21
https://t.co/MxlT5IXqiU I got libraries related to this stuff First I would like to see Dr Ross Adey’s unpublished draft of NCRP Scientific Committee 89-3 For context ; As the chair of a committee of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) investigating ELF health effects, Adey made waves by recommending strong action to curb public exposures. He endorsed a 2 mG exposure standard for 50/60 Hz EMFs (see MWN, J/A95, p.1). This was too radical for the NCRP leadership and today, close to ten years later, the council continues to refuse to release his report. Adey prompted another stir when his studies of long-term exposure to cell phone radiation pointed to what appeared to be a protective effect —that is, exposed mice developed fewer tumors (see MWN, M/J96, p.8; J/A96, p.11; and S/O99, p.13). Motorola, which paid for Adey’s experiments, repudiated this finding and soon afterwards stopped supporting his lab. It closed down a short time later. In an interview with Fortune magazine in October 2000, Adey urged that research continue: “There is a big task ahead to define what the l owest level of safe exposure could be,” he said, predicting that, “Wherever we go we will be immersed in a sea of low-level pulsed microwave signals.”

link preview

🔗 linkRoss Adey (microwavenews.com)
descriptionW. Ross Adey died on May 20th at the age of 82 after a long battle against a series of bronchial infections.Adey, a medical doctor, was a towering figure in the EMF community, who was equally at ease talking about the most recent papers in the biological and medical literature or dissecting the arcane engineering details of an experimental setup.
thumbnail sha25619f0e75d6c2efb34684c7aa63f32ca0f289735de9e54bf5669ce189bafd46575 (10978 bytes)

Linked media above is notarized by reference — bsv.cx captured the link's title and preview image at archive time; it does not host the linked video or page.

posthttps://x.com/doge_riz/status/2102173150360314169
author id1983545076736499712
posted2026-09-21T23:08:30.000Z
manifest sha256bd5a61fe11d8e2b3b448bc7dcb0e8ecef8da1a1af39772db55891075ce3f29d4
text sha25671b6ab18273cc3e8e8de39aefb4813ef41d0d9ed9dfe2a291cd7f00879b649d5
on-chain⛓ anchored — cfff68c42b05c59ecedf4ab41f6844630dae2d15f36d5cbc52f2c48ad543f602

Verify it yourself: the manifest is the exact JSON whose SHA-256 is bd5a61fe11d8e2b3b448bc7dcb0e8ecef8da1a1af39772db55891075ce3f29d4; it binds the tweet id, author, post time, and the SHA-256 of the text above. Re-hash the text to match 71b6ab18273cc3e8e8de39aefb4813ef41d0d9ed9dfe2a291cd7f00879b649d5, and read the anchor transaction's OP_RETURN bsv.cx / x1 / bd5a61fe11d8e2b3b448bc7dcb0e8ecef8da1a1af39772db55891075ce3f29d4 — the block's timestamp proves the post said this at or before that time, with no trust in bsv.cx. Content archived via the X API.

← bsv.cx · JSON · ⚠ Report