@DereckWDewon X · 2026-10-06
A tamper-evident, on-chain timestamp of what this post said. Captured 2026-10-06 18:47 UTC.
This stuff happens with every FUD cycle, like clockwork per annum. A bunch of bad actors inject cognitive dissonance through various means and modes, it gets everybody bristled up into an uproar, like a sand grain under the bivalve's pseudopoda, The remedy: simplicity. Go back to source material. The first three pages of the bitcoin white paper give a person pretty much all the knowledge they need how to keep it real simple and verify. People just get caught up in the glamour of the new paint job on this week's app player derivative, rather than taking stock of the hardware beneath the hood. And people love to engage in farming through costly signals for some hlfassed attempt at celebritas.
Verify it yourself: the manifest is the exact JSON whose
SHA-256 is 8938ccb236ea5359cdc9ff741ee48867c8ce1acbf04788fd7fca64b3891b1fc8; it binds the tweet id, author, post time, and the SHA-256 of the text above. Re-hash the text to match 2081e9543fc59d0992fb1089bee54ed4f6f8add5745684c41096714927945aa1, and read the anchor transaction's OP_RETURN
bsv.cx / x1 / 8938ccb236ea5359cdc9ff741ee48867c8ce1acbf04788fd7fca64b3891b1fc8 — the block's timestamp proves the post said this at or before that time,
with no trust in bsv.cx. Content archived via the X API.
